<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Broadband Guide Blogs &#187; Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://broadbandguide.com.au/blogs/tag/australian_federation_against_copyright_theft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://broadbandguide.com.au/blogs</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:37:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Fact is AFACT iiNet</title>
		<link>http://broadbandguide.com.au/blogs/2009/06/a-fact-is-afact-iinet/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandguide.com.au/blogs/2009/06/a-fact-is-afact-iinet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFACT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iiNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Piracy]]></category>
    <offer><![CDATA[]]></offer>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/broadband_news_and_technology/archive/2009/06/11/a-fact-is-afact-iinet.aspx</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ongoing Federal Court saga of AFACT vs. the peoples ISP republic of iiNet, is gaining momentum as accusations of &#8216;on a fishing exercise&#8217; and &#8216;an attempt to gain political mileage&#8217; are being thrown back and fourth across the courtroom.It appears that AFACT, Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft who attempting to prove that iiNet was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><P mce_keep="true">The ongoing Federal Court saga of AFACT vs. the peoples ISP republic of iiNet, is gaining momentum as accusations of &#8216;on a fishing exercise&#8217; and &#8216;an attempt to gain political mileage&#8217; are being thrown back and fourth across the courtroom.<BR><BR>It appears that AFACT, Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft who attempting to prove that iiNet was involved in copyright breach, need to get their facts straight, or so iiNet are suggesting.&nbsp; <BR><BR>In the latest development,&nbsp;iiNet has requested AFACT to surrender various documentation that includes similar copyright action taken against other ISPs. It&#8217;s thought that this information could assist iiNet in understanding what were appropriate measures to stop iiNet&#8217;s customers who committed online piracy.<BR><BR>AFACT appears to have back peddled by dismissing this action as nothing more than an attempt to obtain &#8216;political mileage&#8217;, while iiNet stated that AFACT is was on a &#8216;fishing exercise&#8217; that would ultimately fail and were struggling to get a reasonable case together. <BR><BR>The fact is, iiNet are in real trouble and if proven guilty, ramifications could have dire consequences.&nbsp; The whole&nbsp;P2P and file&nbsp;sharing network is at stake here, especially if&nbsp;iiNet is found guilty and a precedent is set.<BR><BR>The hearing continues next week with a ruling on the request anticipated. <BR><BR>Compare Broadband Plans with huge download limits right here at <A title="Australian Broadband Plans" href="http://broadbandguide.com.au/" mce_href="http://broadbandguide.com.au/">Broadbandguide.com.au</A><BR><BR></P></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandguide.com.au/blogs/2009/06/a-fact-is-afact-iinet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

